DARPA - Histórico de revisão

Raphael Carneiro em 17h23min de 5 de julho de 2013

2013-07-05T17:23:27Z

Raphael Carneiro em 17h21min de 5 de julho de 2013

2013-07-05T17:21:06Z

Raphael Carneiro em 17h17min de 5 de julho de 2013

2013-07-05T17:17:48Z

Raphael Carneiro em 07h52min de 5 de julho de 2013

2013-07-05T07:52:19Z

Raphael Carneiro em 07h50min de 5 de julho de 2013

2013-07-05T07:50:19Z

Raphael Carneiro em 07h45min de 5 de julho de 2013

2013-07-05T07:45:25Z

Raphael Carneiro em 07h42min de 5 de julho de 2013

2013-07-05T07:42:09Z

Raphael Carneiro em 07h29min de 5 de julho de 2013

2013-07-05T07:29:49Z

Raphael Carneiro em 07h26min de 5 de julho de 2013

2013-07-05T07:26:55Z

Raphael Carneiro em 07h17min de 5 de julho de 2013

2013-07-05T07:17:40Z

@@ Linha 85: / Linha 85: @@
 The guys from Brazil did great in the VRC competition! The '''Br Robotics Team''' ranked #12 out of the 26 qualifiers. One can tell how tough is to belong to this two-digit-score club by the following tale. The  U.S. Government invited 10 top-class teams from USA and one from Israel, funding $375,000 each to develop robotic software and compete in the DARPA VRC. They were tagged Track B teams. Eventually only 10 Track B teams were successful in the qualifying test. These teams came from high-tech companies (Lockheed Martin, TRAC Labs, TORC Robotics, RE2), top-class universities (MIT, Carnegie Mellon, Washington, Ben-Gurion) and advanced research centers (NASA JPL, Florida IHMC).
-Over 100 non-funded teams had applied for the VRC competition, and they were tagged Track C teams. Only 16 Track C teams were successful in the qualifying test, telling how narrow was that funnel. These Track C teams came from universities and research organizations located in USA and six other countries: Japan, UK, Spain, Poland, Brazil and Mexico. After a few weeks the 26 teams met at the VRC three-day competition, and tested their skills in simulated robotic locomotion and dexterity. The tasks were so hard that 4 out of the 26 qualified teams were unable to score during the three days. The '''Br Robotics Team''' is glad to be able to score 16 times. Another remarkable achievement of our team is to overmatch the performance of 3 Track B funded teams. We ranked #5 out of the 16 Track C teams, standing behind of only a couple of teams from USA and Japan.
+Over 100 non-funded teams had applied for the VRC competition, and they were tagged Track C teams. Only 16 Track C teams were successful in the qualifying test, telling how narrow was that funnel. These Track C teams came from universities and research organizations located in USA and six other countries: Japan, UK, Spain, Poland, Brazil and Mexico. After a few weeks, the 26 teams met at the VRC three-day competition, and tested their skills in simulated robotic locomotion and dexterity. The tasks were so hard that 4 out of the 26 qualified teams were unable to score during the three days. The '''Br Robotics Team''' is glad to be able to score 16 times. Another remarkable achievement of our team is to overmatch the performance of 3 Track B funded teams. We ranked #5 out of the 16 Track C teams, standing behind of only a couple of teams from USA and Japan.
 ([http://www.theroboticschallenge.com/local/documents/Scoreboard%20Final.pdf See the VRC Final Scoreboard])
@@ Linha 203: / Linha 203: @@
-After all, what's the big deal about making a robot walk, drive and grasp things? Well, we've done it in few weeks, while a baby carbon-based unit takes more than a year!
+After all, what's the big deal about making a robot walk, drive and grasp things? Well, we've spent a few weeks to make it happen, while a baby carbon-based unit takes more than a year!
 [[imagem:atlas.jpg|80px|]]

@@ Linha 83: / Linha 83: @@
 == '''Our achievements''' ==
-The guys from Brazil did great in the VRC competition! The '''Br Robotics Team''' ranked #12 out of the 26 qualifiers. One can tell how tough is to belong to this two-digit-score club by the following tale. The  U.S. Government invited 10 top-class teams from USA and one from Israel, and funded $375,000 each to develop robotic software and compete in the DARPA VRC. They were tagged Track B teams. Eventually only 10 Track B teams were successful in the qualifying test. These teams came from high-tech companies (Lockheed Martin, TRAC Labs, TORC Robotics, RE2), top-class universities (MIT, Carnegie Mellon, Washington, Ben-Gurion) and advanced research centers (NASA JPL, Florida IHMC).
+The guys from Brazil did great in the VRC competition! The '''Br Robotics Team''' ranked #12 out of the 26 qualifiers. One can tell how tough is to belong to this two-digit-score club by the following tale. The  U.S. Government invited 10 top-class teams from USA and one from Israel, funding $375,000 each to develop robotic software and compete in the DARPA VRC. They were tagged Track B teams. Eventually only 10 Track B teams were successful in the qualifying test. These teams came from high-tech companies (Lockheed Martin, TRAC Labs, TORC Robotics, RE2), top-class universities (MIT, Carnegie Mellon, Washington, Ben-Gurion) and advanced research centers (NASA JPL, Florida IHMC).
 Over 100 non-funded teams had applied for the VRC competition, and they were tagged Track C teams. Only 16 Track C teams were successful in the qualifying test, telling how narrow was that funnel. These Track C teams came from universities and research organizations located in USA and six other countries: Japan, UK, Spain, Poland, Brazil and Mexico. After a few weeks the 26 teams met at the VRC three-day competition, and tested their skills in simulated robotic locomotion and dexterity. The tasks were so hard that 4 out of the 26 qualified teams were unable to score during the three days. The '''Br Robotics Team''' is glad to be able to score 16 times. Another remarkable achievement of our team is to overmatch the performance of 3 Track B funded teams. We ranked #5 out of the 16 Track C teams, standing behind of only a couple of teams from USA and Japan.

@@ Linha 83: / Linha 83: @@
 == '''Our achievements''' ==
-The guys from Brazil did great in the VRC competition! The '''Br Robotics Team''' ranked #12 out of the 26 qualifiers. One can tell how tough is to belong to this two-digit-score club by reading the following tale. The  U.S. Government invited 10 top-class teams from USA e one from Israel, and funded $375,000 each to develop robotic software and compete in the DARPA VRC. They were tagged Track B teams. Eventually only 10 Track B teams were successful in the qualifying test. These teams came from high-tech companies (Lockheed Martin, TRAC Labs, TORC Robotics, RE2), top-class universities (MIT, Carnegie Mellon, Washington, Ben-Gurion) and advanced research centers (NASA JPL, Florida IHMC).
+The guys from Brazil did great in the VRC competition! The '''Br Robotics Team''' ranked #12 out of the 26 qualifiers. One can tell how tough is to belong to this two-digit-score club by the following tale. The  U.S. Government invited 10 top-class teams from USA and one from Israel, and funded $375,000 each to develop robotic software and compete in the DARPA VRC. They were tagged Track B teams. Eventually only 10 Track B teams were successful in the qualifying test. These teams came from high-tech companies (Lockheed Martin, TRAC Labs, TORC Robotics, RE2), top-class universities (MIT, Carnegie Mellon, Washington, Ben-Gurion) and advanced research centers (NASA JPL, Florida IHMC).
 Over 100 non-funded teams had applied for the VRC competition, and they were tagged Track C teams. Only 16 Track C teams were successful in the qualifying test, telling how narrow was that funnel. These Track C teams came from universities and research organizations located in USA and six other countries: Japan, UK, Spain, Poland, Brazil and Mexico. After a few weeks the 26 teams met at the VRC three-day competition, and tested their skills in simulated robotic locomotion and dexterity. The tasks were so hard that 4 out of the 26 qualified teams were unable to score during the three days. The '''Br Robotics Team''' is glad to be able to score 16 times. Another remarkable achievement of our team is to overmatch the performance of 3 Track B funded teams. We ranked #5 out of the 16 Track C teams, standing behind of only a couple of teams from USA and Japan.

← Edição anterior		Edição das 07h52min de 5 de julho de 2013
Linha 203:		Linha 203:


−	After all, what's the big deal about making a robot walk, drive and grasp things? Well, we've done it in few weeks, while a baby carbon-based unit takes a year ~~or more~~!	+	After all, what's the big deal about making a robot walk, drive and grasp things? Well, we've done it in few weeks, while a baby carbon-based unit takes more than a year!
	[[imagem:atlas.jpg\|80px\|]]		[[imagem:atlas.jpg\|80px\|]]

← Edição anterior		Edição das 07h50min de 5 de julho de 2013
Linha 203:		Linha 203:


−	After all, what's the big deal about making a robot walk, drive and grasp things? ~~Let~~'~~s pick this iron man and give~~ it ~~another try~~!	+	After all, what's the big deal about making a robot walk, drive and grasp things? Well, we've done it in few weeks, while a baby carbon-based unit takes a year or more!
	[[imagem:atlas.jpg\|80px\|]]		[[imagem:atlas.jpg\|80px\|]]

@@ Linha 92: / Linha 92: @@
 {| border=1
-|+ '''DARPA Virtual Robotics Challenge Top Performers'''
+|+ '''DARPA Virtual Robotics Challenge's Top Performers'''
 |- bgcolor="#DFDFDF" |
 ! Ranking

← Edição anterior		Edição das 07h17min de 5 de julho de 2013
Linha 203:		Linha 203:


−	After all, what's the big deal about making a robot walk, drive and grasp things? Let's pick this ~~big guy~~ and give it another try!	+	After all, what's the big deal about making a robot walk, drive and grasp things? Let's pick this iron man and give it another try!
	[[imagem:atlas.jpg\|80px\|]]		[[imagem:atlas.jpg\|80px\|]]